The blackout protest hit hard, much harder then I thought. Overnight, the support for SOPA overwhelmingly shifted against it. Supposedly, protests against it were so intense that it Overwhelmed the personal contact addresses of US Senators. As a Nebraska native, I am pleased that every congressman we have except one (Ben Nelson, whom is not re-running) has pulled support for this bill. I am (MUCH) less pleased that one of our congressfolks (Lee Terry) helped sign and initially support this bill. He pulled his support, so I am going to give him one last chance*, but he’s got an uphill battle.
Maddox (whom I have mixed feelings about) has suggested that it would have been better if SOPA had passed. I don’t agree with that for a number of reasons, however I definitely appreciate the sentiment behind it. It’s what I call the batman principal. A dramatic example is needed to shake people out of apathy (and despite all the “occupation” of various places and increased desire to be at least minimally activist, apathy is the order of the day). Here are the following things that seem to be needed to really “wage war” against the system as it stands.
-A grave injustice (already there, but see below why what is already there isn’t “enough”)
-A powerful example or figure to rally around
-A culture of belief that their actions matter.
These kinds of grave injustices are there, and within the last couple of decades, have become increasingly common. So why haven’t people bothered to act. Well there are a lot of reasons, but one major one is that these have become so common that it is culturally accepted to be a matter of course for this kind of crap to occur (particularly within major government or corporate infrastructure). I have also been saying that people have become more selectively in-taking information to preserve their view of reality being a nice place, or more accurately, that the life they are living isn’t a “part” of the world where all the various problems of the world happen. “Sure, people get shot and killed all the time, but that’s ‘over there’ in _____, it won’t happen to me or my family.” As long as people are content with whats within their life and scared of everything outside of it, they will be numb to the problems around them. However, with the extreme starkness of the problems at hand, it’s getting increasingly difficult to keep up that illusion. It’s at a very minor and frankly, ineffectual scale, but people are beginning to act again. More on that later. My point being that these things are considered common and contextually acceptable in the United States, and it almost seems like people are testing to see how far they can push it.
The second factor, a powerful example or figure to rally around, is what Maddox is effectively stating SOPA would be. I’ll be honest, he would be right (I still think it not passing is for the best, but more on that later). Charismatic leaders are effectively neutralized by the entertainment media. A group desiring ratings who feel (or whose parent companies feel) things like SOPA (for example) is in their best interests. In the past, people like MLK Jr got on meet the press. Many of the people in the hippie movement used the power of the media as an (effective) weapon. Nowadays, that would never happen. It is painfully obvious that the media is being sat on by various interests. I speculate what changed them from straight shooters to more party liners and parrots was the Vietnam war, but I digress. People like Dr King or Gloria Stienem could never be created in today’s framework and do what they did on a national level. Even if they were born with all the right tools and the right motive (and there is no shortage of reasons for the latter). They would quickly be suppressed, character assassinated, and diverted from. Anything to keep the people in the necessary state of docile apathy to maintain the status quo. A terrible incident that can’t be swept under the rug like SOPA passing would presumably qualify (although if they are subtle about how the law is implemented, it might not be enough until it is too late. Even I didn’t know about the DMCA until 2005). Once a society is accustomed to a freedom and it becomes a fundamental part of their daily lives, removing it is almost impossible. Also, while this is largely reduced to romantic tales and excuses to go to war, a national identity of freedom of expression and winning that from the tyrants of the era is still enough of a driving force. Also, the national distrust for the Chinese regime that dates back to the cold war would have an impact too (since we would essentially be doing what they’re doing and helping other countries try to escape from). Again, it has to be something to shock people into action. At the risk of invoking a trigger, look at the after effects of 9/11. A tragedy pure and simple, but it completely changed the national paradigm. A US senator can safely say with a straight face “free speech is nice, but we’re at war” when supporting something like the PATRIOT act. Before that tragic incident, anybody who said that (even if there was a real war going on) would be duly shouted down for sacrificing the very things the US is supposed to stand for for the sake of winning that war. However, I digress.
This leads into the last point. Because of the saturation of corruption, a complete lack of trustworthiness in the media, etc., people have come to believe their actions don’t matter. I don’t blame them one bit. On every level in US culture, I hear 2 messages. The broadcast message is the national identity of “everybody matters.” The un-communicated message is much more harsh. It broadcasts a narrative of how nothing we do will ever matter. Read this list and tell me you are still convinced that average US citizens are unjustified in this defeatist view!
-Since the mid 90′s, the US has been semi-consistently getting involved in conflicts that the citizenry largely didn’t believe in.
-The youth demographic (among the seemingly most dejected) are being flat out ignored by politicians
-The outcome of the 2000 election (where it is widely thought Bush Jr didn’t really get elected, but he got in anyway).
-The electoral college system (particularly “winner takes all”)
-Job listings that say unemployed need not apply
-An extreme disparity of wealth, a gap that only grows wider
-The US is arguably one of the least socially mobile countries in the first world. “If you want to live the American Dream, go to Denmark.”
-The aforementioned corruption of the government and media
-A sharply negative cultural stereotype about people who protest and act in an activistic manner (“They’re all just hippies with no concept of reality”).
-Very little evidence that any sort of activistic activity has actually mattered (tell me, how many states reformed their stance on rape after the slutwalks?).
-An extreme disconnect between the people and their elected representatives (which is really how this SOPA thing could POSSIBLY exist)
-Very clear proof that lobbyists and money is a LOT stronger. Proof that in order to influence the government, you have to “buy” it.
The fact that the protests have been appearing at all show that people have reached the breaking point. However, I once again am forced to question the effectiveness of such. One of my metrics of how strong a protest is is how much I hear people talking about it. I haven’t heard the phrase “occupy ______” since last November. A sad fact is that while I was impressed it lasted as long as it did and was as strong as it was, the average person it SHOULD be reaching and encouraging them of the economic situation doesn’t care. It isn’t new and entertaining, it is old and “meh.” If people can tune out SCHOOL SHOOTINGS within the space of a week, what hope is there here?
However, that is slowly eroding…for now. The occupy movement and the slutwalk, although off the radar and largely ignored now, did show people ARE willing to act at least a minimal amount. As is often told to the trolls at Manboobz.com (fun site BTW), there is a difference between bitching on the internet and actually acting (…I am aware of the irony. Before you say anything, I wrote to all Nebraska Senators about how I feel about SOPA). The internet blackout attack worked wonders to strike SOPA down. Victories like these are needed to convince people that what they do actually counts. Remind them that victory is possible and they’ll commit to more of it. It will take a lot more for people to boycott major media companies, but if you can give clear, concrete proof that such an inconvenience will pay off against the SOPA supporters, then more will follow. This scares those who owe their power and wealth to the lobbyist oligarchical model of government that could be argued we are in right now.
In theory, SOPA would have possibly roused the people into action the likes of which we haven’t seen in decades, and best case scenario, it would have shattered the system that lead it into being forever. However, I doubt this would have had that effect. It would have roused the sleeping giant, but it would have simply lead to it being permanently put down.
Here is why that despite the potential unintended benefits, SOPA’s passing will do more harm then long term good.
-The EC will push very hard to follow suit with its own version of the law (see also, the EC version of the DMCA).
-Other countries would follow suit. Now that net censorship is “ok”, other countries will enforce the laws that they hold sacred
-Internet law treaties will be made to lock it in place permanently. According to a journal article I read opposing ACTA (forgot its name, but it was in the Yale Law Journal I think), international treaties are traditionally given precedence to internal laws. Even if it goes against the US constitution, it will be locked in place by international treaties that would be, by design, almost impossible to get out of.
-Government sovereignties will find that they like the new fractionated view of the world. Since it toes in line with the unilateral media model where end-users are only consumers that the companies crave so much, they would like it too (although they would wish they could do it more globally). It would increase the idea of territorial sovereignty in cybersapce, which makes the nation feel more powerful. Nations would not want to go back to a free internet when it would feel like they are effectively conceding territory to “terrorists” (and that is what people who long to go back to the free internet model will be called).
-Since people have been docile so far, they’ll adjust to this too. It won’t ignite a fire, people would just get distracted and the people involved will be slow to implement it. It will be done in a way that sneaks up on people until it’s gone so far that there is no way out.
We won the battle, but not the war. Several bills like this have been attempted (some have passed). This has been going on ever since the media saw the recorded tape as a threat in the 1980s. The US trade office has made it its mission to globalize the DMCA for the sake of economic hegemony. ACTA was initiated in 2006 to do much the same thing (despite its initial secrecy, public pressure managed to set in after it was leaked. It was enough to reduce it to the initial WIPO treaties, considered a failure by the USTR). It was particularly aimed in getting Canada to have a DMCA like measure (which recently did happen because of the conservative party sweeping the entire senatorial body). They will make a bill like this again. The only thing the IIPA people here have learned is to not make it so overt. The theory is that the next bill will be hidden inside some sort of child protection bill. Anybody who opposes that would be committing political suicide (after all “____ is someone who opposed a bill that would protect your children from predators!”). They will do it. The only thing we can do is be ready and keep fighting. Don’t stop now because we won against SOPA. If anything, this is a perfect chance to mount an assault. They are wounded. We need to show them that we won’t tolerate any more bills of this nature ever again.
*Whoever runs against him has to be as bad as Rick Santorum to get me to overlook him for his amount of support on this bill. I’m giving him at least that much, but not an inch more unless he really owns up to his opposition of the IDEA behind this bill.